Page 17 - Microsoft Word - Extended_Course_MLIS_Ref_Mgt.docx
P. 17
Referencing and Bibliography Management Tools
3.1 Historical Context:
Z39.50 emerged in the late 1980s and early 1990s as libraries moved from card catalogs to
automated systems. It enabled a standard method for searching remote databases, regardless
of the vendor, software, or metadata schema used.
3.2 How Z39.50 Works
A Z39.50 client sends search queries to a Z39.50 server hosted by a bibliographic database
(e.g., Library of Congress, WorldCat, university libraries). The server processes the query
using its internal catalog and returns records in a structured format (often MARC21). Clients
can then retrieve, display, and import the data into their local systems.
3.3 Protocol Features
Structured Queries: Allows complex Boolean, fielded, and truncated searches.
Result Set Handling: Supports record display, sorting, and batch retrieval.
Transport Neutral: Functions over TCP/IP but not tied to a specific UI or
application.
3.4 Applications in Reference Management
Zotero and EndNote support Z39.50 servers for importing metadata.
Used in Koha, Evergreen, and other ILS to retrieve catalog records.
Enables copy cataloging, saving time and reducing duplication of effort.
3.5 Example Use Case
A researcher using EndNote can connect to the Library of Congress Z39.50 server, enter a
title or ISBN, and retrieve the MARC-based bibliographic metadata directly into their library.
EndNote, being a proprietary tool, offers sophisticated features tailored for researchers
working with extensive datasets. Its custom field creation and advanced filtering mechanisms
support nuanced literature reviews, especially in medical and engineering fields. By investing
in EndNote, institutions facilitate a structured and scalable research environment.
3.6 Benefits of Z39.50
Cross-platform interoperability: Works across library systems and catalog
standards.
Access to legacy catalogs: Many national libraries still offer Z39.50 endpoints.
High-precision searching: Designed for structured bibliographic fields.
3.7 Limitations and Challenges